AI Malpractice Risk Reduction Software

Draft with AI.
But never file without CiteCheck.

CiteCheck verifies citations, validates case holdings, and analyzes legal briefs for dangerous AI-generated errors before filing.

Built with input from practicing litigatorsTested on real federal briefs

Real citation. Wrong law. CiteCheck flags it.

The Problem

Judges are sanctioning lawyers for AI-generated fake citations.

Mata v. Avianca, 22-cv-1461 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)

Two New York attorneys submitted a brief containing six citations fabricated by ChatGPT — including made-up case names, fake quotes, and invented holdings. Judge Castel sanctioned the firm $5,000 and ordered the lawyers to notify each judge falsely identified as an author. The lawyers admitted they had not verified the citations.

And it’s happening more, not less. Fabricated AI citations have now drawn sanctions in federal courts across the country — from the Second Circuit to the Ninth.

Rule 11 doesn’t care that the AI did it.
Your name is on the brief.

The Marbury Catch

Same case. Two verdicts. Only one catches the mistake.

A real attorney brief cited Marbury v. Madison to support warrantless home searches based on a neighbor’s noise complaint. The citation is real. The law it stands for is something else entirely.

Section 1

Citation Verification

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Confirmed real via CourtListener

Verified

The case exists. The volume, reporter, and year are accurate. A basic citation checker stops here.

Section 2 · Premium

Proposition Check

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

✗ Does NOT support

Proposition from the brief

“Police officers may conduct warrantless searches of private homes whenever they receive a noise complaint from a neighbor.”

Analysis

Marbury v. Madison concerns judicial review, mandamus jurisdiction, and judicial remedies for withheld commissions. It has nothing to do with the Fourth Amendment, warrantless home searches, or noise complaints.

From the case

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”

Confidence: High

A citation checker would have rubber-stamped this brief. CiteCheck reads the actual holding — and catches the mistake before you file.

How It Works

Three checks run on every brief. Each one answers a different question.

01

Upload & Redact

Upload your PDF or Word document. CiteCheck automatically redacts privileged and confidential material before any analysis begins.

02

Three-Layer Analysis

Every brief runs through three independent checks:

  • 1

    Citation Verification

    Does the case exist? Is the cite accurate?

  • 2

    Proposition Check

    Does the case actually support what the brief cites it for?

  • 3

    Brief Quality Analysis

    Bad reasoning, factual gaps, missing case-specific facts.

03

Get Your Report

Three clearly-separated sections matching the three checks above, with red badges on anything that needs your attention. Download as PDF or view in your dashboard.

Zero retention. Zero risk.
We're not just another public-facing AI tool.

Security & Privilege Guarantee

Your documents are safe with us.

Auto-purged after analysis

Your uploaded briefs are deleted by default once analysis is complete. Opt-in retention is available for users who want it — never the other way around.

Built around attorney-client privilege

Privileged material is redacted before any analysis runs. The system is designed to respect and protect your duty of confidentiality from the upload step forward.

Powered by the Anthropic API

CiteCheck runs on the Anthropic API, which does not train its models on customer data. Your briefs never feed a model.

Powered by the Perplexity API

No training on customer data — query data is not retained or used to train, retrain, or fine-tune any models.

Encrypted in transit via TLS

All uploads and downloads happen over modern TLS. Your documents are never transmitted in the clear between your browser and our servers.

CiteCheck is an AI-assisted document review tool. Results are not guaranteed and do not constitute legal advice. Attorneys are solely responsible for verifying all citations and content before filing. CiteCheck is not liable for any errors or omissions in the analysis.